Discuss:Application Builder here I suggest that it may be more productive to skip the Carbon version of the builder for Mac OS X; Cocoa may be easier for cross-platform with Intel based machines, and most advanced interface code is OO anyway. -- anonymous

---

For Windows platforms, might it be more attractive to target the .NET platform rather than the native Windows C API? Performance would suffer, and I can't tell you how much, but you could get things off the ground a lot faster by leveraging the dynamic binding available via the meta-data in .NET. Also, this is the direction that most Windows application development is headed now, and UI manipulation is easier in this environment. There are a couple of Lisp interfaces available to .NET, RDNZL by Edi Weitz probably being the best known. OTOH, perhaps there are too many unknowns yet in Lisp/.NET interaction. -- DanMuller

---

This page is presently Uncategorized: please add appropriate category markers? and remove this text.